Regarding, it seems like that extension should have a Phabricator tag/project in this installation, if it doesn't already, where we can track issues with that code. It's not clear to me whether resolving T133547 would solve use-case(s). This is T133547: set up automated HTML (restbase) dumps on francium? The main thing that is missing is actually offering HTML dumps, but I know is working on making that (finally) happen. not do that, right? We solved this problem for file uploads by using hash partials for the directory and subdirectory names (i.e., the /2/20/ in ). Is there some requirement to use a single directory? You could just. Restoring the usual 7z files with HTML inside is still Millions of files in a single directory tend to get unwieldy, so this wouldn't be very usable as the default distribution format. In short: fixing dumpHTML is still useful. Several sysadmins would be happy to uninstall MediaWiki while not breaking the web, as I know from my WikiTeam work. a website which doesn't require a database, a PHP interpreter or anything) is definitely less useful for Wikimedia wikis than it used to be before Kiwix (and mwoffliner with Parsoid), but would still be quite useful for non-Wikimedia wikis. Providing a facility to turn a MediaWiki website into a static website (i.e. I tried "directory of HTML files", "static HTML files", "static website" and so on, but with little success. I would appreciate suggestions on how to call the "usual" HTML dumps in a way that avoids any confusion, since I believe they still have a purpose. The dev-friendly HTML dumps have their uses, which however don't satisfy what the original reporters of this bug had in mind. a dump which only contains HTML but that no end user at all is able to use directly simply by a series of clicks. Lately this task has been declined in favour of what I called a dev-friendly HTML dump, i.e. A large part of that is now best done via Kiwix. someone making a web mirror, or local mirror as the LAN you describe). This is something that anyone can do, but that end-users usually enjoyed via some intermediary (e.g. "Direct navigation" is what this task has in mind: you get a file, uncompress it and start navigating HTML pages as on any website. Thanks for responding to that point: we definitely need some clarity on terminology. As such, the HTML dumps were intended for direct end-user navigation
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |